Commonwealth Bank Of Australia - Banking Oath Organization Czars tear into David Cohen, Are bank staff liable asks bank industry czars
As I release this letter to the public, I want to acknowledge the kindness and understanding of the Banking Financial Oath Team. I am not doing this lightly but the findings (I don't believe) were ever released as they said they would.
So many times CBA have been found guilty of misconduct in my matter, so many times CBA and it's team of legals have admitted they have done wrong and yet I continued to be pummeled into the ground and go down for THEIR crime!
This letter has no right to be kept in the dark. It clearly shows, what others are aware of and that is my matter clearly comes under the heading of 'Deceit for financial gain' and 'Serious Misconduct'.
Exert below from the BFO letter attached!
"It should be stated upfront that this situation has exposed employees of The Commonwealth Bank of
Australia (CBA) who have acted in self-interest with minimal regard to you, Ms Burge, and your experience
has unashamedly resulted in real grief. The CBA cannot feel proud about this and it has raised questions as
to how this could have been avoided."
Please note that David Cohen was on the Signatory list of the BFO on the Thursday prior to Easter. The BFO unhappy that I had released this letter to the RC and 2 others asked me to retract it. I declined to do this. The following week after Easter David Cohen's name was no longer on the signatory list.
Matt Comyn knows of my matter and has refused to contact me or fix my matter, so should Matt Comyn either remove his name from the list or be removed? I say immediately.
Parliamentary Inquiry into Customer Impaired Loans 4/4/2016 David Cohen stated that my matter shouldn't have happened, he would take it seriously and that they would reduce my loan amount by the amount over lent. He failed to do this and then told the BFO that he didn't know who this person was (letter provided to BFO showing that I had contacted him in regards to this and he most certainly knew who it was). This was a False and Misleading Statement made to the Parliamentary Inquiry and to the BFO.
Letter to the CCMC in regards to CBA admitting that they breached the code of banking Practice in relation to my matter (letter is on my page).
Mr. Jackson SC (CBA Barrister) admitting in court 10/2/2016 that he conceded that I had a reasonable chance with the evidence presented (not exact wording). This was repeated by AsJ Holt to me.
Mr. Jackson SC letter to the LPBT (on my page) in relation to working with my briefly appointed Barrister in relation to me signing a Deed of Settlement and Release that according to Mr. Jackson I did not want to sign. I allege Serious Professional Misconduct.
We also can't forget the Financial Ombudsman Determination of maladministration in lending (floored with mistakes admitted by Justi Tonti-Fillipini), but none the less that GUILTY of Maladministration in lending verdict is there! FOS put in writing that if they find maladministration in lending then their aim is to restore the complainant to where they were? FOS FAILURE ... BIG TIME!
HOW THE BLOODY *** am I still in ***
Reason of review: Problem with delivery.
Monetary Loss: $999999.
Preferred solution: Full refund.
I liked: Banking oath investigations into the cba.